Sunday, November 25, 2012

Social and Cultural Contexts of Assessments

“When test scores go up, we should worry, because of how poor a measure they are of what matters, and what you typically sacrifice in a desperate effort to raise scores.”
 Alfie Kohn





Alfie Kohn- "The Case Against Tougher Standards"


Although this was a short reading, I had to read it a few times to retain Kohn's points and arguments because he had many.  I appreciate how Kohn, like Kliewer, called out so-called professionals at the beginning of the reading in relation to just who are the experts in education.  It seems like these "experts" use terms and catch phrases to vocalize what school reform should be such as "accountability" and do whatever is in their power to further change policies to ensure their vision be implemented in the classroom.  If most educators are reluctant and unhappy in teaching this way, it provides such a negative climate in schools.  I have witnessed seasoned teachers become very frustrated with having to "teach to the test".  I have heard a few say out loud that these tests have taken the imagination and creativity out of teaching.

 It is difficult to tell Democrats and Republicans apart because, professionally speaking, they fall into a role of politician above anything.  Unless this Democrat or Republican taught,  he/she does not have the proper, first-hand  knowledge to say what works for students and what doesn't.  Even I as a teacher often struggles with what works in the classroom and what doesn't.  There is constant reflection happening as to what changes can be made to help students learn. These tests insinuate a one-size fits all approach to teaching and learning.  It just isn't realistic. Clearly some students will have an advantage in these standardized tests while others are disadvantaged but as a whole, these tests are ineffective in assessing student knowledge that is meaningful and useful for the students.  

The Five Fatal Flaws piece was useful because it put the arguments of why standardized testing doesn't work into organized sections.  As I was reading them, I thought that they were all equally valid and individual pieces to the larger puzzle of what makes these tests such a bad idea.  I think most educators realize it gets motivation wrong and that the pedagogy consists of certain skills and as a result is often very dull and non-creative.  It was refreshing to see the words in print.  Even though I was at private schools for five years we still had standardized testing.  It didn't seem to be as important to a student's educational snap shot but nonetheless was still present.  The people at the top of the pyramid want high scores from tests that reflect a lot of meaningless information but fail to see how limited these tests truly are.


Below is a link to a very interesting video by Kohn in relation to rigorous, test oriented schooling:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aviOJ9DVcyo&feature=watch-vrec








6 comments:

  1. 1. You're opening quote is something I found frustrating as well. I'd like to extend your quote... the idea that I took away is that if the test were good, then no one would score well, but if the test were bad, then the scores would be good. Apparently we are settling for a bad test so that most students do well... I mean graduation hinges on this multiple choice exam.

    2. Kohn would agree with you about democrats and republicans, at least to the degree of how education benefits the work force, as was indicated in your video. I really liked the video too. Usually I sit through hours of material but yours was quick to move from topic to topic and still supply good answers. I find him to be very well spoken: "I think that is an intellectually and morally bankrupt position to have."

    3. We will discuss the Five Fatal Flaws in more depth tomorrow. Since it was a shorter reading, Geoff and I read more of the articles that Kohn wrote and referenced. They are equally as eye-opening and compelling (in my opinion). I didn't respect Alfie Kohn when I was first introduced to him as an undergrad, but I have definitely come around as I've become a more experienced educator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Clearly some students will have an advantage in these standardized tests while others are disadvantaged but as a whole, these tests are ineffective in assessing student knowledge that is meaningful and useful for the students."
    Yep and yep. the tests are biased towards privileged students. Ben found a few math MCAS word problems that illustrate this well. One in particular presented a situation in which the subject was buying things from a catalog. Is a kid on free and reduced lunch buying things from a catalog?
    And your second point is so true: the "knowledge" being tested is not very useful. Kohn would describe it as "temporary"....retained just long enough to be regurgitated back (in bubble form of course). GK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A few years ago I had the opportunity to work on a "test item bias-insensitivity review board". It was such an eye-opening experience! I found myself involved in conversations about not involving cows in questions, because students from cities might not know what they are. Or not mentioning snow, because students in the south may have never experienced it. I loved the experience, because it provided a completely different perspective on the tests that we place in front of our students every year.

      Delete
  3. I agree, Rachel, when you talked about reflection. There is constant reflection that goes on throughout a teacher's career. Some things that worked one year, I just know won't work this year. The classes have such different dynamics and different personalities. That's actually the part about teaching that makes my heart sing. To tweak something, know my students, and have it work is so cool. Even when things are tweaked and it does not go too well, it is fun to be honest with the kids. "Man, that lesson didn't work for you did it?" I try so hard to surround myself with teachers and activities that are positive, especially during these crazy CCSS, PARCC, Teacher Eval crazy times : )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Positive huh? I sincerely hope that I don't drive you crazy with my 'check-ins'. This group offers me an outlet for a few minutes to simply ask if things make sense or if they're crazy. I find that being an individual in this line of work requires you to do one of two things: (1) embrace the things you're told to do by administrators, peers, and the government at the risk of losing any and all respect of your students or (2) embrace your students and lose any and all respect both for and from administrators, peers, and the government. From my limited perspective, and I'm only realizing this right now, I'm not sure that anyone can be honestly in between. That quote from Nathaniel Hawthorne comes to mind, "No man for any considerable period can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true."

      Delete