Monday, October 22, 2012

“Anti-Teaching: Confronting the Crisis of  Significance” by Michael Wesch


I enjoyed this reading for its many positive points on education.  I also felt insightful after reading it because there were many useful ideas presented that we as educators can implement in the classroom.  Wesch's overall argument is a good one.  He writes, "The problem with education today is the problem of significance itself.  Students-our most important critics- are struggling to find meaning and significance in the education." (pg.5)  This quote gave me an a-ha moment because it tied everything together for me.  The institution of education that we have at the moment clearly needs reform.  While I realize standardized testing is here to stay for the moment, there are other things that educators can do in the classroom to give students experiences that offer personal meaning.  It reminded me of Johnson by the way he practices what he preaches in the classroom.  Both of these writers provide a classroom that is "democratic" and reflects on their students' needs.  Wesch wants his students to ask meaningful questions and strives to provide an environment that allows them to think outside the box.  This is important for students to make connections to the world around them in their own terms.  I believe that is when a student is truly interested and "gets it". 

I immediately watched "A Vision of Students Today".  It started off eerie with the song playing and empty classroom.  It then became jaw dropping as students were shown and started raising their notebooks with the alarming facts on the realities of being at this state college.  I felt very fortunate because this was not my experience as an undergraduate at RIC.  The most I had in a classroom was 30 and all my professors knew my name after two weeks.  It was sad to read the information the students surveyed on themselves such as the debt they will be in, money spent on text books not read, and the lack of sleep they get.  It was clear that the students related more to the technological world than the reality right in front them. It is scary that these students were getting very little out of some of the classes they were in. Some of these students will be in debt from taking some classes they get very little out of.  That in itself is alarming.  The link for "A Vision of Students Today" is below. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o 


Another quote from the article that I found interesting was as follows: "As for myself, I have increasingly focused less on simply trying to convey good information and more on inspiring good questions. It struck me that all learning begins with a good question, and if we are ultimately trying to create “active lifelong learners” with“critical thinking skills” and an ability to “think outside the box” it might be best to start by getting students to ask better questions."(pg.6)  This quote stuck out to me because I have been reflecting lately on all the key terms and teacher jargon that go around as best practices but which ones are truly implemented to help all learners.  If we as teachers want our students to think critically it will have to be on the students terms and experiences, not what some "experts" think.  It had me thinking about how teachers can become more involved with curriculum writing and how what is important for our students should be brought to the table when considering curriculum reform.  I don't know if curriculum reform will happen anytime soon but we can start in our own classrooms.  I believe it is important for educators to realize it is a changing world and to find ways to connect with their students if the curriculum doesn't reflect what is important. 

It is important for students to have a purpose for their own education and to take ownership of it.  Wesch writes, "when students recognize their own importance in helping to shape the future of this increasingly global, interconnected society, the significance problem fades away."(pg.7)  I think that human beings like to have a mission so to speak and a reason for doing something.  I think Wesch is claiming that when students are given a mission or personal reason for doing something, they will take the challenge.  One aspect to a global, interconnected world is the use of technology in the classroom.  I think any teaching tool is good when used in a way that the students will find meaning and truly learn.  I am still not clear on Wesch's standpoint on using technology but based on his article and video, I think that he would be for it if students found meaning in it.  I added a link for a very well-written article on technology in the classroom. 






5 comments:

  1. "This quote stuck out to me because I have been reflecting lately on all the key terms and teacher jargon that go around as best practices but which ones are truly implemented to help all learners. If we as teachers want our students to think critically it will have to be on the students terms and experiences, not what some "experts" think."

    Rachel - I'm with you on the jargon and so-called experts. It's the experience that is so crucial to learning, and how we can connect to the students. It's almost like things gets overly complicated using unnecessarily big words - simplifying would make life easier and more straightforward for students!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Corey-
      Thanks for the reply. I agree that things should be simplified and straightforward. I don't know how some experts in education can be considered experts when they have never even worked with youngsters. Teachers and students should have a say when it comes to concepts being taught and how.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rachel, I appreciate that you focused on the positive messages from Wesch. When he talks about the problem of significance and the importance or focus of asking good questions, I was encouraged too. However, I have always had an issue with focusing on relevance. You and Corey have already mentioned how much teachers can appreciate the experience of other educators, and my experience forcing relevance in an Algebra 2 class has been largely negative. But I think this is a result of my content. Geometry is the only class I teach where students can literally see the topics we discuss in their life.

    I mentioned to Madonna last week, after inquiring as to why best-selling novels aren't used in English classes, that if I turned this question/argument on myself, that I would probably vomit. I'm not sure I was clear at the time... I think if we focus 100% on relevance, most math teachers are sincerely out of a job because students can't appreciate the abstract nature of algebra, if at all, until after the fact.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One of my favorite guys, physicist Richard Feynman wrote, "If you look closely enough at anything, you will see that there is nothing more exciting than the truth, the pay dirt of the scientist, discovered by his painstaking efforts."
    Discovery is made small steps at a time--each step preceded by a good question. The small steps lead to a coherent, cohesive thought. If the kids want to learn, they can, and they'll discover there is no better feeling. But, this is uncommon in young people, and it's not their fault. We can provide them with the foundation so that when it does click, they can enjoy being "active lifelong learners".

    ReplyDelete